Velio Logo
tech

The Death of the Interface: Why the Best Tech of 2025 is Invisible

The Velio Team
The Velio TeamDecember 29, 2025 - 21 min read
The Death of the Interface: Why the Best Tech of 2025 is Invisible

The Philosophy of Invisibility

The Legacy of Calm Technology: From PARC to 2025
To understand the trajectory of 2025, we must first look back to 1995. At Xerox PARC, Mark Weiser, the father of ubiquitous computing, articulated a vision that stands in stark contrast to the attention-demanding devices of the smartphone era. Weiser, alongside John Seely Brown, proposed the concept of Calm Technology. They argued that the most profound technologies are those that disappear, weaving themselves into the fabric of everyday life until they are indistinguishable from it. Weiser famously lamented that the personal computing era forced humans and machines to "stare uneasily at one another across the desktop". He envisioned a "third wave" of computing where technology would recede into the background, becoming as omnipresent and invisible as electricity or writing. In 2025, this theoretical framework has transformed from academic philosophy into commercial necessity.

The core tenets of Calm Technology, which now underpin the design of 2025's ambient systems, are:

  1. Peripheral Attention: Technology must shift smoothly between the center of attention and the periphery. It should inform without demanding focus. A smart home system that adjusts the lights based on time of day works in the periphery; a phone notification that buzzes and lights up demands central focus.
  2. Increasing Peripheral Use: By engaging the periphery—through auditory cues, ambient light, or haptic feedback—technology prevents cognitive overburdening. This creates a pleasant user experience by not "overheating" the user's attentional capacity.
  3. Familiarity and Context: Systems must rely on a sense of familiarity, understanding the user's past, present, and future context to function intuitively. A calm system knows you are home not because you opened an app to tell it, but because it sensed your arrival.
For the past decade, the tech industry inadvertently violated these principles. The "Attention Economy" monetized the seizure of focus, resulting in "systemic friction" and widespread cognitive exhaustion. The shift to Ambient Computing in 2025 is a corrective mechanism—a return to Weiser's vision where the computer is a "quiet, invisible servant" rather than a demanding master.
The Evolution of User Interaction: From Command to Anticipation

The history of human-computer interaction (HCI) can be categorized by the proximity of the interface to the user's intent and the friction required to execute it.

  • The Mainframe Era (Remote): Interaction was scarce, specialized, and physically removed from the user. Computing was an event one went to, not a layer one lived in.
  • The Personal Computing Era (Explicit): Interaction became one-to-one. The user sat in front of a box and issued explicit commands via CLI or GUI. The computer was a tool that did nothing until told.
  • The Mobile Era (Continuous/Intrusive): Interaction became continuous but remained explicit. Users carried the computer (smartphone) everywhere, but every action required unlocking, navigating an OS, opening an app, and tapping. This era was defined by "using" technology.
  • The Ambient Era (Implicit/Anticipatory): Commencing roughly in 2025, interaction becomes implicit. The computer "lives out here in the world with people". It anticipates needs based on context (location, biometrics, time, history) and executes outcomes.
This transition represents the Zero UI movement. Zero UI does not imply the total absence of visual feedback but rather the removal of the screen as the primary bottleneck for action. It relies on voice, gesture, glance, and, crucially, predictive context. In 2025, the paradigm has shifted from "Human-in-the-Loop," where the user verifies every step, to "Human-on-the-Loop," where the user sets a goal and the system executes the workflow autonomously. This "interface extinction" is driven by a competence inversion. In early 2025, the prevailing narrative was that humans must augment AI to prevent errors. By late 2025, data suggested that for many execution tasks, human intervention actually lowered output quality and introduced latency. Consequently, the user's role is shifting from pilot to passenger—defining the destination (intent) while the machine handles the navigation (execution).
The Death of the Interface: Why the Best Tech of 2025 is Invisible

The Brains - From Large Language Models to Large Action Models

The Limitations of LLMs in an Agentic World
To understand the technical foundation of Ambient Computing, one must distinguish between the "brains" that process information and the "hands" that execute tasks. Through 2023 and 2024, the industry was dominated by Large Language Models (LLMs). LLMs are probabilistic engines designed to predict the next token in a sequence; they excel at generation, summarization, and translation.
However, LLMs are fundamentally passive. An LLM can write an email, but it cannot send it without external integrations. It can describe how to book a flight, generating a beautiful itinerary, but it cannot navigate the airline's legacy booking system to finalize the transaction. The limitation of the LLM lies in its inability to interact with the "real" world (digital or physical) autonomously. They lack the "action layer" required for true ambient computing. This gap necessitated the development of Large Action Models (LAMs).
The Rise of Large Action Models (LAMs)
Large Action Models (LAMs) represent the critical architectural breakthrough of 2025. Unlike LLMs, which output text, LAMs output actions. They are designed to understand human intent and translate it into executable steps within digital interfaces or physical environments. While an LLM might function as a conversationalist, a LAM functions as an agent. If LLMs are the "Broca's area" (speech production) of AI, LAMs are the "Motor Cortex" (movement execution).
Technical Distinction Between LLMs and LAMs
The Neuro-Symbolic Architecture and Logic Planning

The sophistication of LAMs in 2025 lies in their multi-layered architecture, which often employs a "neuro-symbolic" approach. This combines the neural network's ability to understand vague natural language commands with symbolic logic planners that can verify steps.

Primary Output
  • Large Language Model (LLM): Text, Code, Images
  • Large Action Model (LAM): API Calls, UI Clicks, Robotic Control
Core Function
  • LLM: Information Processing & Generation
  • LAM: Task Execution & Decision Making
Interaction Mode
  • LLM: Conversational / Passive
  • LAM: Agentic / Active
Architecture
  • LLM: Transformer-based (Next Token Prediction)
  • LAM: Neuro-Symbolic (Intent to Action)
Environment
  • LLM: Static Text/Data Context
  • LAM: Dynamic Digital & Physical Worlds
Example Utility
  • LLM: "Write a travel itinerary for Tokyo."
  • LAM: "Book the flights, hotel, and dinner reservations."
Feedback Loop
  • LLM: Minimal (Conversation context only)
  • LAM: High (Real-time error correction, self-healing)
The Neuro-Symbolic Architecture and Logic Planning

The sophistication of LAMs in 2025 lies in their multi-layered architecture, which often employs a "neuro-symbolic" approach. This combines the neural network's ability to understand vague natural language commands with symbolic logic planners that can verify steps.

  1. Semantic Understanding Layer: Usually a Transformer-based model that parses the user's natural language request to extract intent and parameters (e.g., "Order me a ride to the office" -> Intent: Ride Share, Destination: Office).
  2. Logic Planning Layer: A symbolic reasoning engine that transforms the intent into a sequence of actions. This layer is crucial for "multi-hop" reasoning—solving problems that require navigating through multiple screens or applications. For example, a LAM booking a trip might need to check a calendar, then find a flight, then email a confirmation. The planner ensures these happen in the correct logical order.
  3. Execution Coordination Layer: This layer interfaces with the digital world. Crucially, LAMs can be trained to "see" User Interfaces (UI) directly. They identify buttons, text fields, and dropdowns visually, mimicking human interaction. This allows them to operate legacy apps that have no public API, a capability famously marketed by Rabbit's R1 OS.
  4. Feedback Layer: The LAM monitors the result of its action. If a button click fails or a page loads slowly, the system adapts in real-time, a capability known as "self-healing" or dynamic adaptability. Unlike an RPA script that breaks if a button moves, a LAM "looks" for the button's new location.

This architecture enables the "Competence Inversion" mentioned earlier. By standardizing complex workflows into repeatable, error-checked action sequences, LAMs reduce the variability and bias inherent in human execution. They are the engine of the ambient world, turning the "request" into the "result" without the user needing to touch the screen.

The Death of the Interface: Why the Best Tech of 2025 is Invisible

The Body - Agentic Hardware and the Physical World

The Failure of Generation 1: Rabbit R1 and Humane AI Pin
The transition to invisible interfaces was not without significant stumbling blocks. The years 2024 and early 2025 were characterized by the high-profile failures of "Generation 1" dedicated AI hardware, specifically the Humane AI Pin and the Rabbit R1. These devices promised to liberate users from smartphones but ultimately failed due to a fundamental disconnect between their ambition and the maturity of the underlying infrastructure.
Humane AI Pin: This device attempted to replace the screen with a laser projector and voice commands. It consisted of a front unit and a magnetic battery booster. However, it suffered from severe technical limitations:
  • Latency: It relied almost entirely on cloud processing. Every command had to be sent to a server, processed, and returned, resulting in multi-second delays that broke the illusion of "ambient" conversation.
  • Thermal Issues: The device frequently overheated, becoming uncomfortable to wear.
  • Ecosystem Isolation: It lacked deep integration with the apps users actually relied on.
  • Outcome: By February 2025, Humane's assets were acquired by HP for $116 million—a fraction of its $850 million valuation—marking the end of the experiment. The remaining units were set to stop working by the end of that month.
Rabbit R1: Marketed as a companion device powered by a proprietary LAM (Rabbit OS), the R1 featured a playful design by Teenage Engineering. It sold nearly 10,000 units on day one. However, it was quickly revealed to be functionally limited. Critics noted it was effectively an Android app wrapped in budget hardware, and its "LAM" capabilities were often unreliable or simulated via scripted interactions rather than true AI agency.
The Lesson of Gen 1: The failure of these devices provided a crucial lesson for 2025: Latency and Reliability are non-negotiable. Users will not trade the reliability of a screen for an invisible interface that takes ten seconds to respond or "hallucinates" an outcome. Furthermore, these devices failed because they tried to exist outside the established ecosystem rather than integrating with it.
Generation 2: Meta Ray-Ban Display and the Neural Band
In contrast to the failures of Gen 1, Meta's release of the Ray-Ban Display glasses and the Neural Band in late 2025 represents the successful realization of ambient hardware.
The Ray-Ban Display succeeds by adhering to Weiser’s principle of "peripheral attention." It does not attempt to replace the phone entirely but augments reality with a high-brightness (5,000 nits) monocular display that is visible only when needed. It utilizes a waveguide display embedded in the right lens, offering a 20-degree field of view that can overlay navigation, translation, and notifications without obstructing eye contact.
However, the true breakthrough is not the glasses, but the Neural Band.
The Neural Band and EMG Technology: The Neural Band utilizes surface electromyography (sEMG) to detect electrical signals from the motor neurons in the wrist. This allows the user to control the interface with "micro-gestures"—subtle movements of the fingers (like tapping the index finger against the thumb) that are imperceptible to others.
  • Why this matters: It solves the "social friction" of voice commands. Using voice to read a text message in a quiet meeting, a library, or a crowded train is socially unacceptable. The Neural Band allows for silent, discrete interaction—clicking, scrolling, and even typing—without lifting a hand or speaking a word. This is the closest realization of "telepathic" control in consumer tech, bridging the gap between intent and action with near-zero latency.
Meta Ray-Ban Display & Neural Band Specifications
Display: 600x600 LCOS Waveguide
  • Implication for Ambient Computing: High brightness allows visibility outdoors; monocular design saves battery and reduces distraction.
Control: Neural Band (sEMG)
  • Implication for Ambient Computing: Enables "invisible" input via motor neuron signals; solves the social stigma of voice control.
Context: Multimodal AI (Llama 4)
  • Implication for Ambient Computing: Glasses "see" and "hear" context (e.g., translation, object ID) without prompt.
Battery: 18 Hours (Band)
  • Implication for Ambient Computing: All-day wearability ensures the device is always present (Ambient).
Audio: 5-Mic Array + Open Ear
  • Implication for Ambient Computing: Allows digital audio to blend with physical sound; "Conversation Focus" amplifies speakers.
Weight: 69g (Glasses)
  • Implication for Ambient Computing: Lightweight form factor enables continuous wear, critical for ambient adoption.
Physical AI and World Models: Nvidia Cosmos
While Meta focuses on the consumer interface, NVIDIA is architecting the "brain" for physical AI—robots and autonomous systems that navigate the real world. In 2025, NVIDIA launched Cosmos, a platform for "World Foundation Models" (WFMs).

A "World Model" differs from a language model in that it understands physics, causality, and temporal continuity. It simulates outcomes before they happen.

  • Cosmos Predict: Generates video predictions of future states (e.g., if a robot drops a glass, it breaks). This allows agents to plan complex physical tasks by visualizing the outcome before acting.
  • Cosmos Reason: A reasoning engine that allows robots to act with "common sense" in unstructured environments (e.g., identifying a spill and deciding to clean it up without being explicitly programmed for that specific liquid).
  • Cosmos Transfer: Enables the creation of synthetic training data, taking 3D simulations and turning them into photorealistic video to train robots safely in a digital twin before they enter the real world.
This technology enables "Physical AI" to move from rigid, pre-programmed automation to adaptive, ambient intelligence in factories, smart cities, and homes. It is the infrastructure that allows a home robot to understand that a toy on the stairs is a tripping hazard, not just an obstacle to bypass. Companies like Agility Robotics and Uber are early adopters, using Cosmos to train their fleets.
The Death of the Interface: Why the Best Tech of 2025 is Invisible

The Nervous System - Protocols and Interoperability

The Fragmentation Problem
For Ambient Computing to function like electricity, it must be universally interoperable. A predictive home cannot function if the thermostat (Google) refuses to talk to the blinds (Lutron) or the calendar (Apple). Historically, this fragmentation was the Achilles' heel of the smart home and agentic AI. 2025 has seen the crystallization of protocols designed to solve this: Matter for devices and Agent2Agent (A2A) for software agents.
The "USB-C" of AI: Agent2Agent (A2A) and MCP
As AI agents proliferate, they need a standard language to discover each other and collaborate. Google Cloud's Agent2Agent (A2A) protocol and the Model Context Protocol (MCP) have emerged as the dominant standards in 2025.
Agent2Agent (A2A): A2A allows an agent from one ecosystem (e.g., Salesforce) to "hire" an agent from another (e.g., Workday) to complete a task. It utilizes a decentralized identity system and standard "Agent Cards" that declare capabilities.
  • Workflow: A user asks their Personal Agent to "hire a graphic designer." The Personal Agent broadcasts a discovery request via A2A. A specialized Design Agent responds with its portfolio and rate. The two agents negotiate, execute the contract, and deliver the work without human mediation.
  • Interoperability: It is built on standard HTTP and JSON-RPC, making it compatible with existing web infrastructure. It solves the "silo" problem where an AI agent was previously trapped within the application that created it.
Model Context Protocol (MCP): While A2A handles communication, MCP standardizes context. It solves the problem of how to feed the right data (documents, database records) to an LLM without building custom integrations for every data source. It acts as a universal "plug" connecting data repositories to AI agents.
  • Mechanism: MCP defines a client-server lifecycle (Initialization -> Operation -> Shutdown) where applications can expose their data to AI assistants securely. This effectively allows an AI to "read" the user's entire digital life (files, chats, logs) through a standardized interface.
The Agentic Browser Wars
The web browser is morphing from a passive window into an active agent. In 2025, browsers like Arc (Dia), Sigma, and Perplexity Comet are redefining the "user agent" concept.
  • The Browser as OS: The "Death of the Interface" is also the death of the website as a destination. Agentic browsers read websites for the user. Features like "Deep Research" in Sigma or "Comet Agent" in Perplexity navigate multiple tabs, scrape data, synthesize findings, and fill out forms automatically.
  • Perplexity Comet: Often cited as the most advanced "autonomous" browser, it includes features for "Deep Research" where it clusters information from multiple sources to generate structured insights, effectively automating the role of a junior research analyst.
  • Dia (Arc): Following the acquisition of The Browser Company by Atlassian for $610 million, Dia integrates AI directly into the URL bar, offering "tab-aware intelligence" that can synthesize data across all open tabs.

This shift necessitates a change in the economic model of the web. If an AI agent reads a news site to summarize it for the user, the user never sees the ads. This "Cometjacking" of content has sparked a crisis in ad-supported media models, pushing the web toward subscription and API-access economies.

The Death of the Interface: Why the Best Tech of 2025 is Invisible

The Habitat - Ambient Intelligence in Homes and Cities

From Remote Control to Predictive Automation
For the last decade, a "smart home" meant a home you could control with a phone—a novelty that often required more effort than flipping a switch. The "Ambience" of 2025 is defined by predictive automation.
Predictive systems utilize data from wearables (biometrics), calendars, and historical behavior to adjust the environment before the user realizes they need it.
  • Context-Aware Climate: Instead of a fixed schedule, an agentic HVAC system checks the user's location (via car GPS) and biometric stress levels (via smart watch). If the user is driving home in a high-stress state, the home prepares a calming lighting scene and optimal temperature.
  • Grid-Interactive Intelligence: Homes now actively participate in the energy grid. Agentic AI optimizes battery use by forecasting solar generation and utility rates, autonomously selling power back to the grid during peak pricing windows without user input. This turns the home from a passive energy consumer into an active market participant.
Ultra-Wideband (UWB) and Matter
The physical enabler of this precision is Ultra-Wideband (UWB) technology. Unlike Bluetooth, which estimates proximity, UWB provides centimeter-level positioning.
Smart Cities and "Living Intelligence"
Ambient computing extends to the urban scale. Living Intelligence—the convergence of sensors, AI, and biotechnology—allows cities to self-regulate.
  • Adaptive Infrastructure: Traffic lights that adjust timing based on real-time computer vision analysis of pedestrian density (using technologies like Nvidia Cosmos to predict flow).
  • Healthcare: Ambient sensors in hospitals monitor patient vitals without wires (using radar/UWB), detecting deterioration trends that a human nurse might miss during spot checks. This "invisible monitoring" extends to the home, where predictive models can alert users to health issues (like heart strain or sleep disorders) before symptoms even appear.
The Death of the Interface: Why the Best Tech of 2025 is Invisible

The Economic Realignment - Monetization and the End of Apps

The Collapse of the App Store Model

The shift to Ambient Computing is an existential threat to the "App Store" economy. When interaction moves from "tapping an icon" to "stating an intent," the app as a visual container becomes obsolete.

  • The Headless Future: In an agentic world, brands do not need a visual UI; they need a robust API. If a user says "Order me a ride," the AI agent chooses the service (Uber, Lyft, Waymo) based on price and speed, not brand loyalty or app design. This commoditizes the service provider.
  • Brand Invisibility: Marketing shifts from "Zero UI" to "Zero Click." Brands must optimize for "Agentic SEO"—ensuring their products are discoverable and trusted by the AI agents making decisions on behalf of humans. A brand's success depends less on website design and more on whether it is "machine-readable".
  • The Funnel Collapse: The traditional marketing funnel (Awareness -> Consideration -> Conversion) collapses. Agents anticipate needs and fulfill them instantly. Presence is earned through anticipation, not visibility.
Monetizing Agency: Pricing Models in 2025

If users aren't downloading apps or seeing ads, how is money made? The economy is shifting toward "Service-as-a-Software" and outcome-based pricing. The pricing landscape has crystallized around four fundamental frameworks.

Emerging Pricing Models for AI Agents
Agent-Based (FTE Replacement)
  • Description: Flat monthly fee per "digital employee." Competes with HR budgets, not IT budgets.
  • Target Use Case: Customer Service, SDR, Data Entry.
  • Example: $1,500/mo for a Sales Agent (e.g., 11x AI).
Outcome-Based
  • Description: Pay only for successful results (e.g., meeting booked, ticket resolved).
  • Target Use Case: Lead Gen, Support.
  • Example: $2.00 per resolved query (Salesforce Agentforce).
Workflow-Based
  • Description: Bundled price for a complex, multi-step process.
  • Target Use Case: Recruitment, Legal Review.
  • Example: $500 per qualified candidate found.
Activity/Consumption
  • Description: Pay per API call or compute minute.
  • Target Use Case: Developer Tools, Infrastructure.
  • Example: Token-based pricing.

This shift is particularly impactful for the Indian IT sector (TCS, Infosys, Wipro). These giants are pivoting from "staff augmentation" (renting humans) to "agent augmentation" (renting outcomes). Revenue growth is now driven by deploying autonomous agents that do the work of 10 humans for the price of one, fundamentally altering their business model from "time and materials" to "value delivered".

The Death of the Interface: Why the Best Tech of 2025 is Invisible

The Cost - Ethics, Psychology, and Society

The Cognitive Atrophy Paradox
The most profound risk of Ambient Computing is internal. As we offload more executive functions to AI—navigation, scheduling, memory, and decision-making—we risk Agency Decay.
  • The Paradox: Cognitive offloading increases short-term efficiency but causes long-term skill erosion. Just as GPS weakened human spatial memory, agentic AI threatens "executive capability." If an AI always negotiates your schedule, writes your emails, and summarizes your reading, your ability to perform these tasks independently atrophies.
  • The Four Stages of Decay: Researchers have identified a progression:
  1. Exploration: Curiosity and convenience.
  2. Integration: AI becomes part of the workflow.
  3. Reliance: AI is critical; human skill begins to fade.
  4. Addiction: Inability to function effectively without AI assistance.
However, proponents argue for the Flow State theory. By offloading mundane cognitive load (friction), AI frees the human mind to enter states of deep creativity and "flow" more easily. The AI becomes a partner in the "authorship loop," rather than a replacement, potentially allowing humans to achieve higher levels of abstraction and problem-solving.
The Ethics of Invisible Surveillance

"Zero UI" is synonymous with "Total Surveillance." For a home to be truly predictive, it must watch and listen constantly.

  • Privacy in a Sensor-Rich World: The use of UWB, facial recognition, and constant audio monitoring creates a digital panopticon. Unlike a phone, which can be put away, ambient sensors are embedded in the infrastructure—light bulbs, thermostats, walls.
  • Security Vulnerabilities: "Touchless" interfaces introduce new attack vectors. Biometric data (face, gait, voice) can be spoofed or stolen. Once a biometric key is compromised, it cannot be reset like a password.
  • Identity and Deepfakes: The ability to replicate human identity (voice, face) has led to a crisis of trust. In India, deepfake technology has been used to reconstruct identities for fraud, not by stealing data, but by synthesizing it. This challenges legal frameworks like the DPDP Act, which protect data but not digital personhood.
Social Impact: The Friction-Free Life

Sociologically, the elimination of friction removes the "serendipity" of life. Automated shopping, automated dating, and automated scheduling create "filter bubbles" in the physical world.

  • Class Divides: A divide is emerging between those who can afford "human" interaction and those served by agents. Ironically, human service becomes the luxury good, while the masses are served by efficient, invisible AI agents.
  • The "Human-in-the-Loop" Liability: By late 2025, the narrative shifted to viewing human intervention as a "liability" or bottleneck. Systems are being designed to exclude humans to maintain speed and accuracy, raising fundamental questions about human agency in a mechanized world.
  • Workforce Disruption: As AI agents replace "knowledge work" tasks (coding, writing, analysis), entire sectors face an existential crisis. The shift is from "using tools" to "supervising agents," requiring a massive reskilling of the workforce toward strategy and oversight rather than execution.
The Death of the Interface: Why the Best Tech of 2025 is Invisible

The Era of "Living Intelligence"

The "Death of the Interface" is not an end, but a metamorphosis. In 2025, technology is shedding its exoskeleton—the screens, keyboards, and apps that defined the previous era—to become something more elemental. We are entering the age of Living Intelligence, where systems sense, learn, adapt, and evolve alongside us.
This shift delivers on the thirty-year-old promise of Mark Weiser's Calm Technology. It offers a future where technology is a "quiet, invisible servant," managing the complexities of modern existence so that humans can reclaim their attention. The Neural Band and agentic eyewear , the neuro-symbolic LAMs , and the predictive smart homes all point toward a world where the best technology is the kind you don't have to look at.

However, this invisibility comes at a price. It demands a surrender of control to algorithms that operate in the background, a potential atrophy of human cognitive skill, and an acceptance of pervasive surveillance as the cost of convenience. As we move into 2026, the challenge for developers, policymakers, and users is no longer "How do we make the interface better?" but "How do we retain our humanity when the interface disappears?"

The screen is dead. Long live the Agent.

Keep reading

Random picks from across Velio.

Why Your Next Office Monitor Must Be 144Hz
Tech15 min read
Why Your Next Office Monitor Must Be 144Hz

Why 60Hz is obsolete in 2026. Discover how 144Hz displays reduce eye strain, boost productivity, and why gaming tech is now the essential office health standard.

By The Velio TeamJan 3, 2026
TypeScript 2025: Evolution or Extinction?
Tech6 min read
TypeScript 2025: Evolution or Extinction?

Is TypeScript losing its crown? Explore the 2025 dev landscape, rising salaries, developer burnout, and Microsoft’s 10x faster Go-based "Project Corsa."

By The Velio TeamDec 27, 2025
The Invisible Home: Solar Glass and Smart Curtains
lifestyle
The Invisible Home: Solar Glass and Smart Curtains

Discover how transparent solar windows and smart curtains are redefining urban energy in 2026. Explore the "Vertical Power Plant" and the latest BIPV trends from key players like UbiQD and SolarGaps.

By The Velio TeamJan 4, 2026
Why the Future of AI Fits in Your Pocket
tech
Why the Future of AI Fits in Your Pocket

As we move deeper into 2025, a profound inversion is reshaping the technological landscape. The frontier of AI innovation has migrated from distant, massive cloud servers to the in

By The Velio TeamDec 15, 2025
Meet the Ambient AI Turning Homes into Caregivers
lifestyle
Meet the Ambient AI Turning Homes into Caregivers

Meet ElliQ: The proactive AI companion fighting senior loneliness. Discover how social robotics and 'invisible' tech are redefining independence for the 100-year life.

By The Velio TeamDec 29, 2025